KWR vs MTX: Which Stock Is the Better Buy?
Quaker Chemical Corporation and Minerals Technologies Inc. side by side — fundamentals from SEC filings, refreshed nightly. Sector: Basic Materials.
AI verdict — KWR vs MTX, read from the filings
The stronger business, the cheaper stock, and the risks — synthesised from both companies’ SEC filings, every figure computed not guessed. Not investment advice.
| Quaker Chemical Corporation (KWR) | Minerals Technologies Inc. (MTX) | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $2.4B | $2.4B |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $1.89B | $2.07B |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-2.49M | $-18.40M |
| Revenue growth (5y CAGR) | 5.9% | 5.4% |
| Net margin | -0.1% | -0.9% |
| Return on equity | -0.2% | -1.1% |
| P/E ratio | 533.0 | 15.0 |
| Dividend yield | 1.4% | 0.6% |
| Profitable years (of last 10) | 8 | 9 |
| Positive free cash flow | Yes | Yes |
Verify the comparison
Use the filing period and source shown by each tool before treating two figures as comparable.
See the full KWR vs MTX breakdown
Both companies across 19 years of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow — with ratios, health checks and Ask, the SEC-grounded research assistant. Free, no account needed.
Open KWR's full financials → Open MTX's full financials →Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, KWR or MTX?
Quaker Chemical Corporation is larger by market capitalization — $2.4B versus $2.4B.
Which grows faster, KWR or MTX?
Over the last five fiscal years, Quaker Chemical Corporation grew revenue faster — 5.9%/yr versus 5.4%/yr, computed from SEC-filed statements.
Where does this data come from?
All figures are computed from official SEC filings (10-K), refreshed nightly. This is a data comparison, not investment advice.