BCC vs MTX: Which Stock Is the Better Buy?
Boise Cascade Company and Minerals Technologies Inc. side by side — fundamentals from SEC filings, refreshed nightly. Sector: Basic Materials.
AI verdict — BCC vs MTX, read from the filings
The stronger business, the cheaper stock, and the risks — synthesised from both companies’ SEC filings, every figure computed not guessed. Not investment advice.
| Boise Cascade Company (BCC) | Minerals Technologies Inc. (MTX) | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $2.4B | $2.4B |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $6.40B | $2.07B |
| Net income (latest FY) | $132.84M | $-18.40M |
| Revenue growth (5y CAGR) | 3.2% | 5.4% |
| Net margin | 2.1% | -0.9% |
| Return on equity | 6.4% | -1.1% |
| P/E ratio | 23.1 | 15.0 |
| Dividend yield | 1.3% | 0.6% |
| Profitable years (of last 10) | 10 | 9 |
| Positive free cash flow | Yes | Yes |
Verify the comparison
Use the filing period and source shown by each tool before treating two figures as comparable.
See the full BCC vs MTX breakdown
Both companies across 19 years of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow — with ratios, health checks and Ask, the SEC-grounded research assistant. Free, no account needed.
Open BCC's full financials → Open MTX's full financials →Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, BCC or MTX?
Boise Cascade Company is larger by market capitalization — $2.4B versus $2.4B.
Which grows faster, BCC or MTX?
Over the last five fiscal years, Minerals Technologies Inc. grew revenue faster — 5.4%/yr versus 3.2%/yr, computed from SEC-filed statements.
Where does this data come from?
All figures are computed from official SEC filings (10-K), refreshed nightly. This is a data comparison, not investment advice.