PDO vs PRA: Which Stock Is the Better Buy?
Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund and ProAssurance Corporation side by side — fundamentals from SEC filings, refreshed nightly. Sector: Financial Services.
AI verdict — PDO vs PRA, read from the filings
The stronger business, the cheaper stock, and the risks — synthesised from both companies’ SEC filings, every figure computed not guessed. Not investment advice.
| Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund (PDO) | ProAssurance Corporation (PRA) | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $1.8B | $1.3B |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $30.67M | $1.10B |
| Net income (latest FY) | $30.63M | $50.91M |
| Revenue growth (5y CAGR) | -33.8% | 4.6% |
| Net margin | 99.9% | 4.6% |
| Return on equity | 2.1% | 3.8% |
| P/E ratio | 7.1 | 19.6 |
| Dividend yield | 11.8% | — |
| Profitable years (of last 10) | 2 | 7 |
| Positive free cash flow | — | — |
Verify the comparison
Use the filing period and source shown by each tool before treating two figures as comparable.
See the full PDO vs PRA breakdown
Both companies across 19 years of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow — with ratios, health checks and Ask, the SEC-grounded research assistant. Free, no account needed.
Open PDO's full financials → Open PRA's full financials →Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, PDO or PRA?
Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund is larger by market capitalization — $1.8B versus $1.3B.
Which grows faster, PDO or PRA?
Over the last five fiscal years, ProAssurance Corporation grew revenue faster — 4.6%/yr versus -33.8%/yr, computed from SEC-filed statements.
Where does this data come from?
All figures are computed from official SEC filings (10-K), refreshed nightly. This is a data comparison, not investment advice.