PAX vs PRA: Which Stock Is the Better Buy?
Patria Investments Limited and ProAssurance Corporation side by side — fundamentals from SEC filings, refreshed nightly. Sector: Financial Services.
AI verdict — PAX vs PRA, read from the filings
The stronger business, the cheaper stock, and the risks — synthesised from both companies’ SEC filings, every figure computed not guessed. Not investment advice.
| Patria Investments Limited (PAX) | ProAssurance Corporation (PRA) | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $1.8B | $1.3B |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $381.73M | $1.10B |
| Net income (latest FY) | $85.65M | $50.91M |
| Revenue growth (5y CAGR) | 13.8% | 4.6% |
| Net margin | 22.4% | 4.6% |
| Return on equity | 14.0% | 3.8% |
| P/E ratio | 21.2 | 19.6 |
| Dividend yield | 5.5% | — |
| Profitable years (of last 10) | 4 | 7 |
| Positive free cash flow | Yes | — |
Verify the comparison
Use the filing period and source shown by each tool before treating two figures as comparable.
See the full PAX vs PRA breakdown
Both companies across 19 years of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow — with ratios, health checks and Ask, the SEC-grounded research assistant. Free, no account needed.
Open PAX's full financials → Open PRA's full financials →Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, PAX or PRA?
Patria Investments Limited is larger by market capitalization — $1.8B versus $1.3B.
Which grows faster, PAX or PRA?
Over the last five fiscal years, Patria Investments Limited grew revenue faster — 13.8%/yr versus 4.6%/yr, computed from SEC-filed statements.
Where does this data come from?
All figures are computed from official SEC filings (10-K), refreshed nightly. This is a data comparison, not investment advice.