Stocks / MS vs WFC

MS vs WFC: Which Stock Is the Better Buy?

Morgan Stanley and Wells Fargo & Company side by side — fundamentals from SEC filings, refreshed nightly. Sector: Financial Services.

MS is the larger company ($330.8B vs $261.4B). On the fundamentals, WFC earns a higher net margin (24.2% vs 23.0%); MS has the stronger return on equity (14.6% vs 11.2%); WFC trades cheaper on earnings (12.6× vs 17.0×). On the filings, MS carries fewer potential red flags (1 vs 2). Full numbers below — the stronger figure on each row is in green.

AI verdict — MS vs WFC, read from the filings

The stronger business, the cheaper stock, and the risks — synthesised from both companies’ SEC filings, every figure computed not guessed. Not investment advice.

 Morgan Stanley (MS)Wells Fargo & Company (WFC)
Market cap$330.8B$261.4B
Revenue (latest FY)$70.64B$83.70B
Net income (latest FY)$16.25B$20.29B
Revenue growth (5y CAGR)
Net margin23.0%24.2%
Return on equity14.6%11.2%
P/E ratio17.012.6
Dividend yield2.2%2.3%
Profitable years (of last 10)1010
Positive free cash flow

Verify the comparison

Use the filing period and source shown by each tool before treating two figures as comparable.

Compare with another company:

See the full MS vs WFC breakdown

Both companies across 19 years of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow — with ratios, health checks and Ask, the SEC-grounded research assistant. Free, no account needed.

Open MS's full financials →   Open WFC's full financials →

More comparisons

Frequently asked questions

Which is bigger, MS or WFC?

Morgan Stanley is larger by market capitalization — $330.8B versus $261.4B.

Which grows faster, MS or WFC?

Five-year growth data is not available for both companies.

Where does this data come from?

All figures are computed from official SEC filings (10-K), refreshed nightly. This is a data comparison, not investment advice.

Keep exploring

MS fundamentals → · WFC fundamentals → · All 1,500+ companies → · Free screener →