stockportfolio.pro
Stocks / WBS vs WULF
WBS vs WULF
Webster Financial Corporation and TeraWulf Inc. side by side — fundamentals from SEC filings, refreshed nightly. Sector: Financial Services.
WULF is the larger company ($12.0B vs $11.6B). On the fundamentals, WBS grows revenue faster (70.9% vs 57.1%); WBS earns a higher net margin (33.6% vs -392.6%); WBS has the stronger return on equity (10.3% vs -470.9%). Full numbers below — the stronger figure on each row is in green.
| Webster Financial Corporation (WBS) | TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $11.6B | $12.0B |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $2.90B | $168.46M |
| Net income (latest FY) | $974.86M | $-661.42M |
| Revenue growth (5y CAGR) | 70.9% | 57.1% |
| Net margin | 33.6% | -392.6% |
| Return on equity | 10.3% | -470.9% |
| P/E ratio | 11.8 | — |
| Dividend yield | 2.2% | — |
| Profitable years (of last 10) | 10 | 2 |
| Positive free cash flow | Yes | No |
Compare with another company:
See the full WBS vs WULF breakdown
Both companies across 19 years of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow — with ratios, health checks and Ask, the SEC-grounded research assistant. Free, no account needed.
Open WBS's full financials → Open WULF's full financials →More comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, WBS or WULF?
TeraWulf Inc. is larger by market capitalization — $12.0B versus $11.6B.
Which grows faster, WBS or WULF?
Over the last five fiscal years, Webster Financial Corporation grew revenue faster — 70.9%/yr versus 57.1%/yr, computed from SEC-filed statements.
Where does this data come from?
All figures are computed from official SEC filings (10-K), refreshed nightly. This is a data comparison, not investment advice.