WBS vs WULF: Which Stock Is the Better Buy?
Webster Financial Corporation and TeraWulf Inc. side by side — fundamentals from SEC filings, refreshed nightly. Sector: Financial Services.
AI verdict — WBS vs WULF, read from the filings
The stronger business, the cheaper stock, and the risks — synthesised from both companies’ SEC filings, every figure computed not guessed. Not investment advice.
| Webster Financial Corporation (WBS) | TeraWulf Inc. (WULF) | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $11.6B | $12.0B |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $2.90B | $168.46M |
| Net income (latest FY) | $974.86M | $-661.42M |
| Revenue growth (5y CAGR) | 70.9% | 57.1% |
| Net margin | 33.6% | -392.6% |
| Return on equity | 10.3% | -470.9% |
| P/E ratio | 11.8 | — |
| Dividend yield | 2.2% | — |
| Profitable years (of last 10) | 10 | 2 |
| Positive free cash flow | Yes | No |
Verify the comparison
Use the filing period and source shown by each tool before treating two figures as comparable.
See the full WBS vs WULF breakdown
Both companies across 19 years of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow — with ratios, health checks and Ask, the SEC-grounded research assistant. Free, no account needed.
Open WBS's full financials → Open WULF's full financials →More comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, WBS or WULF?
TeraWulf Inc. is larger by market capitalization — $12.0B versus $11.6B.
Which grows faster, WBS or WULF?
Over the last five fiscal years, Webster Financial Corporation grew revenue faster — 70.9%/yr versus 57.1%/yr, computed from SEC-filed statements.
Where does this data come from?
All figures are computed from official SEC filings (10-K), refreshed nightly. This is a data comparison, not investment advice.