TRI vs WCN: Which Stock Is the Better Buy?
Thomson Reuters Corporation and Waste Connections, Inc. side by side — fundamentals from SEC filings, refreshed nightly. Sector: Industrials.
AI verdict — TRI vs WCN, read from the filings
The stronger business, the cheaper stock, and the risks — synthesised from both companies’ SEC filings, every figure computed not guessed. Not investment advice.
| Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI) | Waste Connections, Inc. (WCN) | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $34.7B | $40.3B |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $7.48B | $9.47B |
| Net income (latest FY) | $1.50B | $1.08B |
| Revenue growth (5y CAGR) | 4.1% | 11.7% |
| Net margin | 20.1% | 11.4% |
| Return on equity | 12.6% | 13.1% |
| P/E ratio | 22.8 | 38.7 |
| Dividend yield | 3.2% | 0.9% |
| Profitable years (of last 10) | 4 | 10 |
| Positive free cash flow | Yes | Yes |
Verify the comparison
Use the filing period and source shown by each tool before treating two figures as comparable.
See the full TRI vs WCN breakdown
Both companies across 19 years of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow — with ratios, health checks and Ask, the SEC-grounded research assistant. Free, no account needed.
Open TRI's full financials → Open WCN's full financials →More comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, TRI or WCN?
Waste Connections, Inc. is larger by market capitalization — $40.3B versus $34.7B.
Which grows faster, TRI or WCN?
Over the last five fiscal years, Waste Connections, Inc. grew revenue faster — 11.7%/yr versus 4.1%/yr, computed from SEC-filed statements.
Where does this data come from?
All figures are computed from official SEC filings (10-K), refreshed nightly. This is a data comparison, not investment advice.