Stocks / TRI vs WCN
TRI vs WCN
Thomson Reuters Corporation and Waste Connections, Inc. side by side — fundamentals from SEC filings, refreshed nightly. Sector: Industrials.
| Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI) | Waste Connections, Inc. (WCN) | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $34.7B | $40.3B |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $7.48B | $9.47B |
| Net income (latest FY) | $1.50B | $1.08B |
| Revenue growth (5y CAGR) | 4.1% | 11.7% |
| Net margin | 20.1% | 11.4% |
| Return on equity | 12.6% | 13.1% |
| P/E ratio | 22.8 | 38.7 |
| Dividend yield | 3.2% | 0.9% |
| Profitable years (of last 10) | 4 | 10 |
| Positive free cash flow | Yes | Yes |
Compare them properly — statement by statement
Open either company interactively: 19 years of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow, ratios, health checks, and Ask — the SEC-grounded research assistant.
Open TRI — free Open WCN — freeFrequently asked questions
Which is bigger, TRI or WCN?
Waste Connections, Inc. is larger by market capitalization — $40.3B versus $34.7B.
Which grows faster, TRI or WCN?
Over the last five fiscal years, Waste Connections, Inc. grew revenue faster — 11.7%/yr versus 4.1%/yr, computed from SEC-filed statements.
Where does this data come from?
All figures are computed from official SEC filings (10-K), refreshed nightly. This is a data comparison, not investment advice.