Stocks / PUK vs RJF

PUK vs RJF: Which Stock Is the Better Buy?

Prudential plc and Raymond James Financial, Inc. side by side — fundamentals from SEC filings, refreshed nightly. Sector: Financial Services.

RJF is the larger company ($33.8B vs $32.0B). On the fundamentals, RJF earns a higher net margin (15.1% vs 14.5%); PUK has the stronger return on equity (19.8% vs 17.0%); PUK trades cheaper on earnings (8.3× vs 15.3×). On the filings, PUK carries fewer potential red flags (0 vs 1). Full numbers below — the stronger figure on each row is in green.

AI verdict — PUK vs RJF, read from the filings

The stronger business, the cheaper stock, and the risks — synthesised from both companies’ SEC filings, every figure computed not guessed. Not investment advice.

 Prudential plc (PUK)Raymond James Financial, Inc. (RJF)
Market cap$32.0B$33.8B
Revenue (latest FY)$27.39B$14.06B
Net income (latest FY)$3.98B$2.13B
Revenue growth (5y CAGR)11.5%
Net margin14.5%15.1%
Return on equity19.8%17.0%
P/E ratio8.315.3
Dividend yield2.1%1.2%
Profitable years (of last 10)310
Positive free cash flowYesYes

Verify the comparison

Use the filing period and source shown by each tool before treating two figures as comparable.

Compare with another company:

See the full PUK vs RJF breakdown

Both companies across 19 years of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow — with ratios, health checks and Ask, the SEC-grounded research assistant. Free, no account needed.

Open PUK's full financials →   Open RJF's full financials →

More comparisons

Frequently asked questions

Which is bigger, PUK or RJF?

Raymond James Financial, Inc. is larger by market capitalization — $33.8B versus $32.0B.

Which grows faster, PUK or RJF?

Five-year growth data is not available for both companies.

Where does this data come from?

All figures are computed from official SEC filings (10-K), refreshed nightly. This is a data comparison, not investment advice.

Keep exploring

PUK fundamentals → · RJF fundamentals → · All 1,500+ companies → · Free screener →