stockportfolio.pro
Stocks / MTB vs RJF
MTB vs RJF
M&T Bank Corporation and Raymond James Financial, Inc. side by side — fundamentals from SEC filings, refreshed nightly. Sector: Financial Services.
MTB is the larger company ($33.1B vs $30.9B). On the fundamentals, RJF grows revenue faster (11.5% vs 10.2%); MTB earns a higher net margin (27.9% vs 15.1%); RJF has the stronger return on equity (17.0% vs 9.3%). Full numbers below — the stronger figure on each row is in green.
| M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) | Raymond James Financial, Inc. (RJF) | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $33.1B | $30.9B |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $9.69B | $14.06B |
| Net income (latest FY) | $2.70B | $2.13B |
| Revenue growth (5y CAGR) | 10.2% | 11.5% |
| Net margin | 27.9% | 15.1% |
| Return on equity | 9.3% | 17.0% |
| P/E ratio | 12.7 | 15.0 |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Profitable years (of last 10) | 10 | 10 |
| Positive free cash flow | — | Yes |
Compare with another company:
See the full MTB vs RJF breakdown
Both companies across 19 years of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow — with ratios, health checks and Ask, the SEC-grounded research assistant. Free, no account needed.
Open MTB's full financials → Open RJF's full financials →More comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, MTB or RJF?
M&T Bank Corporation is larger by market capitalization — $33.1B versus $30.9B.
Which grows faster, MTB or RJF?
Over the last five fiscal years, Raymond James Financial, Inc. grew revenue faster — 11.5%/yr versus 10.2%/yr, computed from SEC-filed statements.
Where does this data come from?
All figures are computed from official SEC filings (10-K), refreshed nightly. This is a data comparison, not investment advice.