MTB vs RJF: Which Stock Is the Better Buy?
M&T Bank Corporation and Raymond James Financial, Inc. side by side — fundamentals from SEC filings, refreshed nightly. Sector: Financial Services.
AI verdict — MTB vs RJF, read from the filings
The stronger business, the cheaper stock, and the risks — synthesised from both companies’ SEC filings, every figure computed not guessed. Not investment advice.
| M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) | Raymond James Financial, Inc. (RJF) | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $35.7B | $33.8B |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $9.69B | $14.06B |
| Net income (latest FY) | $2.70B | $2.13B |
| Revenue growth (5y CAGR) | 10.2% | 11.5% |
| Net margin | 27.9% | 15.1% |
| Return on equity | 9.3% | 17.0% |
| P/E ratio | 13.0 | 15.3 |
| Dividend yield | 2.4% | 1.2% |
| Profitable years (of last 10) | 10 | 10 |
| Positive free cash flow | — | Yes |
Verify the comparison
Use the filing period and source shown by each tool before treating two figures as comparable.
See the full MTB vs RJF breakdown
Both companies across 19 years of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow — with ratios, health checks and Ask, the SEC-grounded research assistant. Free, no account needed.
Open MTB's full financials → Open RJF's full financials →More comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, MTB or RJF?
M&T Bank Corporation is larger by market capitalization — $35.7B versus $33.8B.
Which grows faster, MTB or RJF?
Over the last five fiscal years, Raymond James Financial, Inc. grew revenue faster — 11.5%/yr versus 10.2%/yr, computed from SEC-filed statements.
Where does this data come from?
All figures are computed from official SEC filings (10-K), refreshed nightly. This is a data comparison, not investment advice.