stockportfolio.pro
Stocks / FUL vs SMG
FUL vs SMG
H.B. Fuller Company and The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company side by side — fundamentals from SEC filings, refreshed nightly. Sector: Basic Materials.
| H.B. Fuller Company (FUL) | The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG) | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $3.4B | $3.5B |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $3.47B | $3.41B |
| Net income (latest FY) | $151.97M | $145.20M |
| Revenue growth (5y CAGR) | 4.5% | -3.7% |
| Net margin | 4.4% | 4.3% |
| Return on equity | 7.6% | -40.6% |
| P/E ratio | 21.5 | 17.2 |
| Dividend yield | 1.6% | 4.4% |
| Profitable years (of last 10) | 10 | 7 |
| Positive free cash flow | Yes | Yes |
Compare them properly — statement by statement
Open either company interactively: 19 years of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow, ratios, health checks, and Ask — the SEC-grounded research assistant.
Open FUL — free Open SMG — freeFrequently asked questions
Which is bigger, FUL or SMG?
The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company is larger by market capitalization — $3.5B versus $3.4B.
Which grows faster, FUL or SMG?
Over the last five fiscal years, H.B. Fuller Company grew revenue faster — 4.5%/yr versus -3.7%/yr, computed from SEC-filed statements.
Where does this data come from?
All figures are computed from official SEC filings (10-K), refreshed nightly. This is a data comparison, not investment advice.