ET vs KMI: Which Stock Is the Better Buy?
Energy Transfer LP and Kinder Morgan, Inc. side by side — fundamentals from SEC filings, refreshed nightly. Sector: Energy.
AI verdict — ET vs KMI, read from the filings
The stronger business, the cheaper stock, and the risks — synthesised from both companies’ SEC filings, every figure computed not guessed. Not investment advice.
| Energy Transfer LP (ET) | Kinder Morgan, Inc. (KMI) | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $65.9B | $71.7B |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $85.54B | $16.94B |
| Net income (latest FY) | $4.43B | $3.06B |
| Revenue growth (5y CAGR) | 17.0% | 7.7% |
| Net margin | 5.2% | 18.0% |
| Return on equity | 9.0% | 9.8% |
| P/E ratio | 15.9 | 20.8 |
| Dividend yield | 7.0% | 3.7% |
| Profitable years (of last 10) | 9 | 10 |
| Positive free cash flow | Yes | Yes |
Verify the comparison
Use the filing period and source shown by each tool before treating two figures as comparable.
See the full ET vs KMI breakdown
Both companies across 19 years of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow — with ratios, health checks and Ask, the SEC-grounded research assistant. Free, no account needed.
Open ET's full financials → Open KMI's full financials →Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, ET or KMI?
Kinder Morgan, Inc. is larger by market capitalization — $71.7B versus $65.9B.
Which grows faster, ET or KMI?
Over the last five fiscal years, Energy Transfer LP grew revenue faster — 17.0%/yr versus 7.7%/yr, computed from SEC-filed statements.
Where does this data come from?
All figures are computed from official SEC filings (10-K), refreshed nightly. This is a data comparison, not investment advice.