COP vs KRP: Which Stock Is the Better Buy?
ConocoPhillips and Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP side by side — fundamentals from SEC filings, refreshed nightly. Sector: Energy.
AI verdict — COP vs KRP, read from the filings
The stronger business, the cheaper stock, and the risks — synthesised from both companies’ SEC filings, every figure computed not guessed. Not investment advice.
| ConocoPhillips (COP) | Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $146.8B | $1.7B |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $61.55B | $321.74M |
| Net income (latest FY) | $7.99B | $90.89M |
| Revenue growth (5y CAGR) | 26.8% | 28.9% |
| Net margin | 13.0% | 28.2% |
| Return on equity | 12.4% | 11.8% |
| P/E ratio | 20.4 | 34.0 |
| Dividend yield | 2.8% | 10.6% |
| Profitable years (of last 10) | 7 | 5 |
| Positive free cash flow | — | Yes |
Verify the comparison
Use the filing period and source shown by each tool before treating two figures as comparable.
See the full COP vs KRP breakdown
Both companies across 19 years of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow — with ratios, health checks and Ask, the SEC-grounded research assistant. Free, no account needed.
Open COP's full financials → Open KRP's full financials →Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, COP or KRP?
ConocoPhillips is larger by market capitalization — $146.8B versus $1.7B.
Which grows faster, COP or KRP?
Over the last five fiscal years, Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP grew revenue faster — 28.9%/yr versus 26.8%/yr, computed from SEC-filed statements.
Where does this data come from?
All figures are computed from official SEC filings (10-K), refreshed nightly. This is a data comparison, not investment advice.