CMS vs SPH: Which Stock Is the Better Buy?
CMS Energy Corporation and Suburban Propane Partners, L.P. side by side — fundamentals from SEC filings, refreshed nightly. Sector: Utilities.
AI verdict — CMS vs SPH, read from the filings
The stronger business, the cheaper stock, and the risks — synthesised from both companies’ SEC filings, every figure computed not guessed. Not investment advice.
| CMS Energy Corporation (CMS) | Suburban Propane Partners, L.P. (SPH) | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $22.6B | $1.3B |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $8.54B | $1.43B |
| Net income (latest FY) | $1.06B | $106.57M |
| Revenue growth (5y CAGR) | 5.9% | 5.3% |
| Net margin | 12.4% | 7.4% |
| Return on equity | 11.6% | 17.8% |
| P/E ratio | 21.6 | 9.7 |
| Dividend yield | 3.2% | 6.8% |
| Profitable years (of last 10) | 10 | 10 |
| Positive free cash flow | — | Yes |
Verify the comparison
Use the filing period and source shown by each tool before treating two figures as comparable.
See the full CMS vs SPH breakdown
Both companies across 19 years of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow — with ratios, health checks and Ask, the SEC-grounded research assistant. Free, no account needed.
Open CMS's full financials → Open SPH's full financials →Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, CMS or SPH?
CMS Energy Corporation is larger by market capitalization — $22.6B versus $1.3B.
Which grows faster, CMS or SPH?
Over the last five fiscal years, CMS Energy Corporation grew revenue faster — 5.9%/yr versus 5.3%/yr, computed from SEC-filed statements.
Where does this data come from?
All figures are computed from official SEC filings (10-K), refreshed nightly. This is a data comparison, not investment advice.