stockportfolio.pro
Stocks / CMBT vs PTEN
CMBT vs PTEN
Cmb.Tech NV and Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. side by side — fundamentals from SEC filings, refreshed nightly. Sector: Energy.
| Cmb.Tech NV (CMBT) | Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. (PTEN) | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $4.4B | $4.6B |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $1.67B | $4.83B |
| Net income (latest FY) | $160.70M | $-93.64M |
| Revenue growth (5y CAGR) | 24.9% | 33.8% |
| Net margin | 9.6% | -1.9% |
| Return on equity | 6.1% | -2.9% |
| P/E ratio | 8.7 | — |
| Dividend yield | 5.4% | 3.5% |
| Profitable years (of last 10) | 4 | 3 |
| Positive free cash flow | No | Yes |
Compare them properly — statement by statement
Open either company interactively: 19 years of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow, ratios, health checks, and Ask — the SEC-grounded research assistant.
Open CMBT — free Open PTEN — freeFrequently asked questions
Which is bigger, CMBT or PTEN?
Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. is larger by market capitalization — $4.6B versus $4.4B.
Which grows faster, CMBT or PTEN?
Over the last five fiscal years, Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. grew revenue faster — 33.8%/yr versus 24.9%/yr, computed from SEC-filed statements.
Where does this data come from?
All figures are computed from official SEC filings (10-K), refreshed nightly. This is a data comparison, not investment advice.