CMBT vs PTEN: Which Stock Is the Better Buy?
Cmb.Tech NV and Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. side by side — fundamentals from SEC filings, refreshed nightly. Sector: Energy.
AI verdict — CMBT vs PTEN, read from the filings
The stronger business, the cheaper stock, and the risks — synthesised from both companies’ SEC filings, every figure computed not guessed. Not investment advice.
| Cmb.Tech NV (CMBT) | Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. (PTEN) | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $4.4B | $4.6B |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $1.67B | $4.83B |
| Net income (latest FY) | $160.70M | $-93.64M |
| Revenue growth (5y CAGR) | 24.9% | 33.8% |
| Net margin | 9.6% | -1.9% |
| Return on equity | 6.1% | -2.9% |
| P/E ratio | 8.7 | — |
| Dividend yield | 5.4% | 3.5% |
| Profitable years (of last 10) | 4 | 3 |
| Positive free cash flow | No | Yes |
Verify the comparison
Use the filing period and source shown by each tool before treating two figures as comparable.
See the full CMBT vs PTEN breakdown
Both companies across 19 years of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow — with ratios, health checks and Ask, the SEC-grounded research assistant. Free, no account needed.
Open CMBT's full financials → Open PTEN's full financials →More comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, CMBT or PTEN?
Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. is larger by market capitalization — $4.6B versus $4.4B.
Which grows faster, CMBT or PTEN?
Over the last five fiscal years, Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. grew revenue faster — 33.8%/yr versus 24.9%/yr, computed from SEC-filed statements.
Where does this data come from?
All figures are computed from official SEC filings (10-K), refreshed nightly. This is a data comparison, not investment advice.