CLS vs GFS: Which Stock Is the Better Buy?
Celestica Inc. and GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. side by side — fundamentals from SEC filings, refreshed nightly. Sector: Technology.
AI verdict — CLS vs GFS, read from the filings
The stronger business, the cheaper stock, and the risks — synthesised from both companies’ SEC filings, every figure computed not guessed. Not investment advice.
| Celestica Inc. (CLS) | GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $42.6B | $42.7B |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $12.39B | $6.79B |
| Net income (latest FY) | $832.50M | $885.00M |
| Revenue growth (5y CAGR) | 19.6% | -5.7% |
| Net margin | 6.7% | 13.0% |
| Return on equity | 37.6% | 7.4% |
| P/E ratio | 45.0 | 53.0 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.6% |
| Profitable years (of last 10) | 4 | 3 |
| Positive free cash flow | Yes | Yes |
Verify the comparison
Use the filing period and source shown by each tool before treating two figures as comparable.
See the full CLS vs GFS breakdown
Both companies across 19 years of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow — with ratios, health checks and Ask, the SEC-grounded research assistant. Free, no account needed.
Open CLS's full financials → Open GFS's full financials →More comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, CLS or GFS?
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. is larger by market capitalization — $42.7B versus $42.6B.
Which grows faster, CLS or GFS?
Over the last five fiscal years, Celestica Inc. grew revenue faster — 19.6%/yr versus -5.7%/yr, computed from SEC-filed statements.
Where does this data come from?
All figures are computed from official SEC filings (10-K), refreshed nightly. This is a data comparison, not investment advice.