CHDN vs EAT: Which Stock Is the Better Buy?
Churchill Downs Incorporated and Brinker International, Inc. side by side — fundamentals from SEC filings, refreshed nightly. Sector: Consumer Cyclical.
AI verdict — CHDN vs EAT, read from the filings
The stronger business, the cheaper stock, and the risks — synthesised from both companies’ SEC filings, every figure computed not guessed. Not investment advice.
| Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) | Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $6.2B | $6.3B |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $2.93B | $5.38B |
| Net income (latest FY) | $383.00M | $383.10M |
| Revenue growth (5y CAGR) | 22.7% | 11.8% |
| Net margin | 13.1% | 7.1% |
| Return on equity | 37.9% | 103.3% |
| P/E ratio | 16.3 | 14.4 |
| Dividend yield | 0.5% | — |
| Profitable years (of last 10) | 9 | 10 |
| Positive free cash flow | Yes | Yes |
Verify the comparison
Use the filing period and source shown by each tool before treating two figures as comparable.
See the full CHDN vs EAT breakdown
Both companies across 19 years of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow — with ratios, health checks and Ask, the SEC-grounded research assistant. Free, no account needed.
Open CHDN's full financials → Open EAT's full financials →More comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, CHDN or EAT?
Brinker International, Inc. is larger by market capitalization — $6.3B versus $6.2B.
Which grows faster, CHDN or EAT?
Over the last five fiscal years, Churchill Downs Incorporated grew revenue faster — 22.7%/yr versus 11.8%/yr, computed from SEC-filed statements.
Where does this data come from?
All figures are computed from official SEC filings (10-K), refreshed nightly. This is a data comparison, not investment advice.