stockportfolio.pro
Stocks / CHDN vs EAT
CHDN vs EAT
Churchill Downs Incorporated and Brinker International, Inc. side by side — fundamentals from SEC filings, refreshed nightly. Sector: Consumer Cyclical.
| Churchill Downs Incorporated (CHDN) | Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $6.2B | $6.3B |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $2.93B | $5.38B |
| Net income (latest FY) | $383.00M | $383.10M |
| Revenue growth (5y CAGR) | 22.7% | 11.8% |
| Net margin | 13.1% | 7.1% |
| Return on equity | 37.9% | 103.3% |
| P/E ratio | 16.3 | 14.4 |
| Dividend yield | 0.5% | — |
| Profitable years (of last 10) | 9 | 10 |
| Positive free cash flow | Yes | Yes |
Compare them properly — statement by statement
Open either company interactively: 19 years of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow, ratios, health checks, and Ask — the SEC-grounded research assistant.
Open CHDN — free Open EAT — freeFrequently asked questions
Which is bigger, CHDN or EAT?
Brinker International, Inc. is larger by market capitalization — $6.3B versus $6.2B.
Which grows faster, CHDN or EAT?
Over the last five fiscal years, Churchill Downs Incorporated grew revenue faster — 22.7%/yr versus 11.8%/yr, computed from SEC-filed statements.
Where does this data come from?
All figures are computed from official SEC filings (10-K), refreshed nightly. This is a data comparison, not investment advice.