CBL vs FOR: Which Stock Is the Better Buy?
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. and Forestar Group Inc. side by side — fundamentals from SEC filings, refreshed nightly. Sector: Real Estate.
AI verdict — CBL vs FOR, read from the filings
The stronger business, the cheaper stock, and the risks — synthesised from both companies’ SEC filings, every figure computed not guessed. Not investment advice.
| CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. (CBL) | Forestar Group Inc. (FOR) | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $1.5B | $1.4B |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $578.37M | $1.66B |
| Net income (latest FY) | $135.97M | $167.90M |
| Revenue growth (5y CAGR) | -5.5% | 12.3% |
| Net margin | 23.5% | 10.1% |
| Return on equity | 36.3% | 9.5% |
| P/E ratio | 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Dividend yield | 5.0% | — |
| Profitable years (of last 10) | 6 | 9 |
| Positive free cash flow | — | No |
Verify the comparison
Use the filing period and source shown by each tool before treating two figures as comparable.
See the full CBL vs FOR breakdown
Both companies across 19 years of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow — with ratios, health checks and Ask, the SEC-grounded research assistant. Free, no account needed.
Open CBL's full financials → Open FOR's full financials →Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, CBL or FOR?
CBL & Associates Properties, Inc. is larger by market capitalization — $1.5B versus $1.4B.
Which grows faster, CBL or FOR?
Over the last five fiscal years, Forestar Group Inc. grew revenue faster — 12.3%/yr versus -5.5%/yr, computed from SEC-filed statements.
Where does this data come from?
All figures are computed from official SEC filings (10-K), refreshed nightly. This is a data comparison, not investment advice.