BTU vs COP: Which Stock Is the Better Buy?
Peabody Energy Corporation and ConocoPhillips side by side — fundamentals from SEC filings, refreshed nightly. Sector: Energy.
AI verdict — BTU vs COP, read from the filings
The stronger business, the cheaper stock, and the risks — synthesised from both companies’ SEC filings, every figure computed not guessed. Not investment advice.
| Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) | ConocoPhillips (COP) | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $3.2B | $146.8B |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $3.86B | $61.55B |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-52.90M | $7.99B |
| Revenue growth (5y CAGR) | 6.0% | 26.8% |
| Net margin | -1.4% | 13.0% |
| Return on equity | -1.5% | 12.4% |
| P/E ratio | — | 20.4 |
| Dividend yield | 1.1% | 2.8% |
| Profitable years (of last 10) | 5 | 7 |
| Positive free cash flow | No | — |
Verify the comparison
Use the filing period and source shown by each tool before treating two figures as comparable.
See the full BTU vs COP breakdown
Both companies across 19 years of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow — with ratios, health checks and Ask, the SEC-grounded research assistant. Free, no account needed.
Open BTU's full financials → Open COP's full financials →Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, BTU or COP?
ConocoPhillips is larger by market capitalization — $146.8B versus $3.2B.
Which grows faster, BTU or COP?
Over the last five fiscal years, ConocoPhillips grew revenue faster — 26.8%/yr versus 6.0%/yr, computed from SEC-filed statements.
Where does this data come from?
All figures are computed from official SEC filings (10-K), refreshed nightly. This is a data comparison, not investment advice.