ATO vs KEN: Which Stock Is the Better Buy?
Atmos Energy Corporation and Kenon Holdings Ltd. side by side — fundamentals from SEC filings, refreshed nightly. Sector: Utilities.
AI verdict — ATO vs KEN, read from the filings
The stronger business, the cheaper stock, and the risks — synthesised from both companies’ SEC filings, every figure computed not guessed. Not investment advice.
| Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) | Kenon Holdings Ltd. (KEN) | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $28.8B | $3.7B |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $4.70B | $871.93M |
| Net income (latest FY) | $1.20B | $66.27M |
| Revenue growth (5y CAGR) | 10.8% | 15.0% |
| Net margin | 25.5% | 7.6% |
| Return on equity | 8.8% | 4.2% |
| P/E ratio | 21.3 | 45.9 |
| Dividend yield | 2.3% | 5.5% |
| Profitable years (of last 10) | 10 | 3 |
| Positive free cash flow | No | Yes |
Verify the comparison
Use the filing period and source shown by each tool before treating two figures as comparable.
See the full ATO vs KEN breakdown
Both companies across 19 years of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow — with ratios, health checks and Ask, the SEC-grounded research assistant. Free, no account needed.
Open ATO's full financials → Open KEN's full financials →Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, ATO or KEN?
Atmos Energy Corporation is larger by market capitalization — $28.8B versus $3.7B.
Which grows faster, ATO or KEN?
Over the last five fiscal years, Kenon Holdings Ltd. grew revenue faster — 15.0%/yr versus 10.8%/yr, computed from SEC-filed statements.
Where does this data come from?
All figures are computed from official SEC filings (10-K), refreshed nightly. This is a data comparison, not investment advice.