Stocks / ATO vs ED

ATO vs ED: Which Stock Is the Better Buy?

Atmos Energy Corporation and Consolidated Edison, Inc. side by side — fundamentals from SEC filings, refreshed nightly. Sector: Utilities.

On the fundamentals, ATO grows revenue faster (10.8% vs 6.7%); ATO earns a higher net margin (25.5% vs 12.0%); ATO has the stronger return on equity (8.8% vs 8.4%). Both carry 1 potential red flag in the filings. Full numbers below — the stronger figure on each row is in green.

AI verdict — ATO vs ED, read from the filings

The stronger business, the cheaper stock, and the risks — synthesised from both companies’ SEC filings, every figure computed not guessed. Not investment advice.

 Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO)Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED)
Market cap$28.8B
Revenue (latest FY)$4.70B$16.92B
Net income (latest FY)$1.20B$2.02B
Revenue growth (5y CAGR)10.8%6.7%
Net margin25.5%12.0%
Return on equity8.8%8.4%
P/E ratio21.318.4
Dividend yield2.3%3.2%
Profitable years (of last 10)1010
Positive free cash flowNo

Verify the comparison

Use the filing period and source shown by each tool before treating two figures as comparable.

Compare with another company:

See the full ATO vs ED breakdown

Both companies across 19 years of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow — with ratios, health checks and Ask, the SEC-grounded research assistant. Free, no account needed.

Open ATO's full financials →   Open ED's full financials →

More comparisons

Frequently asked questions

Which is bigger, ATO or ED?

Market capitalization data is not available for both companies.

Which grows faster, ATO or ED?

Over the last five fiscal years, Atmos Energy Corporation grew revenue faster — 10.8%/yr versus 6.7%/yr, computed from SEC-filed statements.

Where does this data come from?

All figures are computed from official SEC filings (10-K), refreshed nightly. This is a data comparison, not investment advice.

Keep exploring

ATO fundamentals → · ED fundamentals → · All 1,500+ companies → · Free screener →