ATO vs CWT: Which Stock Is the Better Buy?
Atmos Energy Corporation and California Water Service Group side by side — fundamentals from SEC filings, refreshed nightly. Sector: Utilities.
AI verdict — ATO vs CWT, read from the filings
The stronger business, the cheaper stock, and the risks — synthesised from both companies’ SEC filings, every figure computed not guessed. Not investment advice.
| Atmos Energy Corporation (ATO) | California Water Service Group (CWT) | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $28.8B | $2.8B |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $4.70B | $1.00B |
| Net income (latest FY) | $1.20B | $128.21M |
| Revenue growth (5y CAGR) | 10.8% | 7.5% |
| Net margin | 25.5% | 12.8% |
| Return on equity | 8.8% | 7.6% |
| P/E ratio | 21.3 | 23.1 |
| Dividend yield | 2.3% | 2.7% |
| Profitable years (of last 10) | 10 | 9 |
| Positive free cash flow | No | — |
Verify the comparison
Use the filing period and source shown by each tool before treating two figures as comparable.
See the full ATO vs CWT breakdown
Both companies across 19 years of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow — with ratios, health checks and Ask, the SEC-grounded research assistant. Free, no account needed.
Open ATO's full financials → Open CWT's full financials →Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, ATO or CWT?
Atmos Energy Corporation is larger by market capitalization — $28.8B versus $2.8B.
Which grows faster, ATO or CWT?
Over the last five fiscal years, Atmos Energy Corporation grew revenue faster — 10.8%/yr versus 7.5%/yr, computed from SEC-filed statements.
Where does this data come from?
All figures are computed from official SEC filings (10-K), refreshed nightly. This is a data comparison, not investment advice.