AMBA vs DBD: Which Stock Is the Better Buy?
Ambarella, Inc. and Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated side by side — fundamentals from SEC filings, refreshed nightly. Sector: Technology.
AI verdict — AMBA vs DBD, read from the filings
The stronger business, the cheaper stock, and the risks — synthesised from both companies’ SEC filings, every figure computed not guessed. Not investment advice.
| Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) | Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated (DBD) | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $2.8B | $2.8B |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $390.70M | $3.81B |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-75.86M | $94.60M |
| Revenue growth (5y CAGR) | 11.9% | -0.5% |
| Net margin | -19.4% | 2.5% |
| Return on equity | -12.8% | 8.6% |
| P/E ratio | — | 27.9 |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Profitable years (of last 10) | 2 | 1 |
| Positive free cash flow | Yes | — |
Verify the comparison
Use the filing period and source shown by each tool before treating two figures as comparable.
See the full AMBA vs DBD breakdown
Both companies across 19 years of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow — with ratios, health checks and Ask, the SEC-grounded research assistant. Free, no account needed.
Open AMBA's full financials → Open DBD's full financials →More comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, AMBA or DBD?
Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated is larger by market capitalization — $2.8B versus $2.8B.
Which grows faster, AMBA or DBD?
Over the last five fiscal years, Ambarella, Inc. grew revenue faster — 11.9%/yr versus -0.5%/yr, computed from SEC-filed statements.
Where does this data come from?
All figures are computed from official SEC filings (10-K), refreshed nightly. This is a data comparison, not investment advice.