stockportfolio.pro
Stocks / AMAT vs MU
AMAT vs MU
Applied Materials, Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc. side by side — fundamentals from SEC filings, refreshed nightly. Sector: Technology.
MU is the larger company ($1.18T vs $470.8B). On the fundamentals, MU grows revenue faster (11.8% vs 10.5%); AMAT earns a higher net margin (24.7% vs 22.8%); AMAT has the stronger return on equity (34.3% vs 15.8%). Full numbers below — the stronger figure on each row is in green.
| Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) | Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $470.8B | $1.18T |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $28.37B | $37.38B |
| Net income (latest FY) | $7.00B | $8.54B |
| Revenue growth (5y CAGR) | 10.5% | 11.8% |
| Net margin | 24.7% | 22.8% |
| Return on equity | 34.3% | 15.8% |
| P/E ratio | 55.8 | 49.1 |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Profitable years (of last 10) | 10 | 8 |
| Positive free cash flow | Yes | Yes |
Compare with another company:
See the full AMAT vs MU breakdown
Both companies across 19 years of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow — with ratios, health checks and Ask, the SEC-grounded research assistant. Free, no account needed.
Open AMAT's full financials → Open MU's full financials →More comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, AMAT or MU?
Micron Technology, Inc. is larger by market capitalization — $1.18T versus $470.8B.
Which grows faster, AMAT or MU?
Over the last five fiscal years, Micron Technology, Inc. grew revenue faster — 11.8%/yr versus 10.5%/yr, computed from SEC-filed statements.
Where does this data come from?
All figures are computed from official SEC filings (10-K), refreshed nightly. This is a data comparison, not investment advice.