Stocks / AFL vs BAC

AFL vs BAC: Which Stock Is the Better Buy?

AFLAC Incorporated and Bank of America Corporation side by side — fundamentals from SEC filings, refreshed nightly. Sector: Financial Services.

On the fundamentals, BAC grows revenue faster (5.7% vs -5.0%); BAC earns a higher net margin (27.0% vs 21.2%); AFL has the stronger return on equity (12.4% vs 10.1%). On the filings, AFL carries fewer potential red flags (1 vs 2). Full numbers below — the stronger figure on each row is in green.

AI verdict — AFL vs BAC, read from the filings

The stronger business, the cheaper stock, and the risks — synthesised from both companies’ SEC filings, every figure computed not guessed. Not investment advice.

 AFLAC Incorporated (AFL)Bank of America Corporation (BAC)
Market cap
Revenue (latest FY)$17.16B$113.10B
Net income (latest FY)$3.65B$30.51B
Revenue growth (5y CAGR)-5.0%5.7%
Net margin21.2%27.0%
Return on equity12.4%10.1%
P/E ratio14.614.3
Dividend yield1.9%2.1%
Profitable years (of last 10)1010
Positive free cash flow

Verify the comparison

Use the filing period and source shown by each tool before treating two figures as comparable.

See the full AFL vs BAC breakdown

Both companies across 19 years of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow — with ratios, health checks and Ask, the SEC-grounded research assistant. Free, no account needed.

Open AFL's full financials →   Open BAC's full financials →

Frequently asked questions

Which is bigger, AFL or BAC?

Market capitalization data is not available for both companies.

Which grows faster, AFL or BAC?

Over the last five fiscal years, Bank of America Corporation grew revenue faster — 5.7%/yr versus -5.0%/yr, computed from SEC-filed statements.

Where does this data come from?

All figures are computed from official SEC filings (10-K), refreshed nightly. This is a data comparison, not investment advice.

Keep exploring

AFL fundamentals → · BAC fundamentals → · All 1,500+ companies → · Free screener →