Stocks / ADM vs PG

ADM vs PG: Which Stock Is the Better Buy?

Archer-Daniels-Midland Company and Procter & Gamble Company (The) side by side — fundamentals from SEC filings, refreshed nightly. Sector: Consumer Defensive.

On the fundamentals, ADM grows revenue faster (4.5% vs 2.7%); PG earns a higher net margin (18.4% vs 1.3%); PG trades cheaper on earnings (21.8× vs 35.4×). Neither shows an obvious red flag in the filings. Full numbers below — the stronger figure on each row is in green.

AI verdict — ADM vs PG, read from the filings

The stronger business, the cheaper stock, and the risks — synthesised from both companies’ SEC filings, every figure computed not guessed. Not investment advice.

 Archer-Daniels-Midland Company (ADM)Procter & Gamble Company (The) (PG)
Market cap
Revenue (latest FY)$80.27B$87.03B
Net income (latest FY)$1.08B$16.05B
Revenue growth (5y CAGR)4.5%2.7%
Net margin1.3%18.4%
Return on equity4.7%
P/E ratio35.421.8
Dividend yield2.6%3.0%
Profitable years (of last 10)1010
Positive free cash flowYes

Verify the comparison

Use the filing period and source shown by each tool before treating two figures as comparable.

See the full ADM vs PG breakdown

Both companies across 19 years of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow — with ratios, health checks and Ask, the SEC-grounded research assistant. Free, no account needed.

Open ADM's full financials →   Open PG's full financials →

Frequently asked questions

Which is bigger, ADM or PG?

Market capitalization data is not available for both companies.

Which grows faster, ADM or PG?

Over the last five fiscal years, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company grew revenue faster — 4.5%/yr versus 2.7%/yr, computed from SEC-filed statements.

Where does this data come from?

All figures are computed from official SEC filings (10-K), refreshed nightly. This is a data comparison, not investment advice.

Keep exploring

ADM fundamentals → · PG fundamentals → · All 1,500+ companies → · Free screener →