stockportfolio.pro
FERG vs TRI: Which Stock Is the Better Buy?
Ferguson Enterprises Inc. and Thomson Reuters Corporation side by side — fundamentals from SEC filings, refreshed nightly. Sector: Industrials.
AI verdict — FERG vs TRI, read from the filings
The stronger business, the cheaper stock, and the risks — synthesised from both companies’ SEC filings, every figure computed not guessed. Not investment advice.
| Ferguson Enterprises Inc. (FERG) | Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI) | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $43.5B | $34.7B |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $30.76B | $7.48B |
| Net income (latest FY) | $1.86B | $1.50B |
| Revenue growth (5y CAGR) | 2.5% | 4.1% |
| Net margin | 6.0% | 20.1% |
| Return on equity | 31.8% | 12.6% |
| P/E ratio | 22.1 | 22.8 |
| Dividend yield | 1.6% | 3.2% |
| Profitable years (of last 10) | 4 | 4 |
| Positive free cash flow | Yes | Yes |
See the full FERG vs TRI breakdown
Both companies across 19 years of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow — with ratios, health checks and Ask, the SEC-grounded research assistant. Free, no account needed.
Open FERG's full financials → Open TRI's full financials →More comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, FERG or TRI?
Ferguson Enterprises Inc. is larger by market capitalization — $43.5B versus $34.7B.
Which grows faster, FERG or TRI?
Over the last five fiscal years, Thomson Reuters Corporation grew revenue faster — 4.1%/yr versus 2.5%/yr, computed from SEC-filed statements.
Where does this data come from?
All figures are computed from official SEC filings (10-K), refreshed nightly. This is a data comparison, not investment advice.