stockportfolio.pro
Stocks / NEA vs UTG
NEA vs UTG
Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund and Reaves Utility Income Fund side by side — fundamentals from SEC filings, refreshed nightly. Sector: Financial Services.
| Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income Fund (NEA) | Reaves Utility Income Fund (UTG) | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $3.5B | $3.7B |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $98.54M | $775.14M |
| Net income (latest FY) | $82.10M | $769.15M |
| Revenue growth (5y CAGR) | — | — |
| Net margin | 83.3% | 99.2% |
| Return on equity | 2.3% | 21.8% |
| P/E ratio | 41.4 | 4.7 |
| Dividend yield | 7.0% | 6.1% |
| Profitable years (of last 10) | 3 | 2 |
| Positive free cash flow | — | — |
Compare them properly — statement by statement
Open either company interactively: 19 years of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow, ratios, health checks, and Ask — the SEC-grounded research assistant.
Open NEA — free Open UTG — freeFrequently asked questions
Which is bigger, NEA or UTG?
Reaves Utility Income Fund is larger by market capitalization — $3.7B versus $3.5B.
Which grows faster, NEA or UTG?
Five-year growth data is not available for both companies.
Where does this data come from?
All figures are computed from official SEC filings (10-K), refreshed nightly. This is a data comparison, not investment advice.