stockportfolio.pro
MTB vs PRU: Which Stock Is the Better Buy?
M&T Bank Corporation and Prudential Financial, Inc. side by side — fundamentals from SEC filings, refreshed nightly. Sector: Financial Services.
AI verdict — MTB vs PRU, read from the filings
The stronger business, the cheaper stock, and the risks — synthesised from both companies’ SEC filings, every figure computed not guessed. Not investment advice.
| M&T Bank Corporation (MTB) | Prudential Financial, Inc. (PRU) | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $36.1B | $41.4B |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $9.69B | $57.68B |
| Net income (latest FY) | $2.70B | $3.58B |
| Revenue growth (5y CAGR) | 10.2% | 0.2% |
| Net margin | 27.9% | 6.2% |
| Return on equity | 9.3% | 11.0% |
| P/E ratio | 13.2 | 12.3 |
| Dividend yield | 2.4% | 4.7% |
| Profitable years (of last 10) | 10 | 8 |
| Positive free cash flow | — | — |
See the full MTB vs PRU breakdown
Both companies across 19 years of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow — with ratios, health checks and Ask, the SEC-grounded research assistant. Free, no account needed.
Open MTB's full financials → Open PRU's full financials →More comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, MTB or PRU?
Prudential Financial, Inc. is larger by market capitalization — $41.4B versus $36.1B.
Which grows faster, MTB or PRU?
Over the last five fiscal years, M&T Bank Corporation grew revenue faster — 10.2%/yr versus 0.2%/yr, computed from SEC-filed statements.
Where does this data come from?
All figures are computed from official SEC filings (10-K), refreshed nightly. This is a data comparison, not investment advice.