stockportfolio.pro
Stocks / KMB vs STZ
KMB vs STZ
Kimberly-Clark Corporation and Constellation Brands, Inc. side by side — fundamentals from SEC filings, refreshed nightly. Sector: Consumer Defensive.
| Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) | Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $34.2B | $25.4B |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $16.45B | $9.14B |
| Net income (latest FY) | $2.02B | $1.69B |
| Revenue growth (5y CAGR) | -3.0% | 1.2% |
| Net margin | 12.3% | 18.5% |
| Return on equity | 134.6% | 20.9% |
| P/E ratio | 19.9 | 15.4 |
| Dividend yield | 5.0% | 2.8% |
| Profitable years (of last 10) | 10 | 6 |
| Positive free cash flow | Yes | Yes |
Compare them properly — statement by statement
Open either company interactively: 19 years of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow, ratios, health checks, and Ask — the SEC-grounded research assistant.
Open KMB — free Open STZ — freeFrequently asked questions
Which is bigger, KMB or STZ?
Kimberly-Clark Corporation is larger by market capitalization — $34.2B versus $25.4B.
Which grows faster, KMB or STZ?
Over the last five fiscal years, Constellation Brands, Inc. grew revenue faster — 1.2%/yr versus -3.0%/yr, computed from SEC-filed statements.
Where does this data come from?
All figures are computed from official SEC filings (10-K), refreshed nightly. This is a data comparison, not investment advice.