Stocks / KIM vs LAMR
KIM vs LAMR
Kimco Realty Corporation and Lamar Advertising Company side by side — fundamentals from SEC filings, refreshed nightly. Sector: Real Estate.
KIM is the larger company ($16.5B vs $15.2B). On the fundamentals, KIM grows revenue faster (14.9% vs 7.6%); KIM earns a higher net margin (26.1% vs 25.9%); LAMR has the stronger return on equity (57.3% vs 5.3%). Full numbers below — the stronger figure on each row is in green.
| Kimco Realty Corporation (KIM) | Lamar Advertising Company (LAMR) | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $16.5B | $15.2B |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $2.12B | $2.27B |
| Net income (latest FY) | $554.43M | $586.79M |
| Revenue growth (5y CAGR) | 14.9% | 7.6% |
| Net margin | 26.1% | 25.9% |
| Return on equity | 5.3% | 57.3% |
| P/E ratio | 28.1 | 27.7 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.3% |
| Profitable years (of last 10) | 10 | 10 |
| Positive free cash flow | Yes | Yes |
Compare with another company:
See the full KIM vs LAMR breakdown
Both companies across 19 years of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow — with ratios, health checks and Ask, the SEC-grounded research assistant. Free, no account needed.
Open KIM's full financials → Open LAMR's full financials →More comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, KIM or LAMR?
Kimco Realty Corporation is larger by market capitalization — $16.5B versus $15.2B.
Which grows faster, KIM or LAMR?
Over the last five fiscal years, Kimco Realty Corporation grew revenue faster — 14.9%/yr versus 7.6%/yr, computed from SEC-filed statements.
Where does this data come from?
All figures are computed from official SEC filings (10-K), refreshed nightly. This is a data comparison, not investment advice.