stockportfolio.pro
Stocks / GSM vs MTA
GSM vs MTA
Ferroglobe PLC and Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. side by side — fundamentals from SEC filings, refreshed nightly. Sector: Basic Materials.
| Ferroglobe PLC (GSM) | Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. (MTA) | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $0.7B | $0.6B |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $1.34B | $11.74M |
| Net income (latest FY) | $-170.70M | $-4.24M |
| Revenue growth (5y CAGR) | -19.9% | 69.4% |
| Net margin | -12.8% | -36.1% |
| Return on equity | -28.7% | -1.7% |
| P/E ratio | — | — |
| Dividend yield | 1.5% | — |
| Profitable years (of last 10) | 3 | 0 |
| Positive free cash flow | No | Yes |
Compare them properly — statement by statement
Open either company interactively: 19 years of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow, ratios, health checks, and Ask — the SEC-grounded research assistant.
Open GSM — free Open MTA — freeFrequently asked questions
Which is bigger, GSM or MTA?
Ferroglobe PLC is larger by market capitalization — $0.7B versus $0.6B.
Which grows faster, GSM or MTA?
Over the last five fiscal years, Metalla Royalty & Streaming Ltd. grew revenue faster — 69.4%/yr versus -19.9%/yr, computed from SEC-filed statements.
Where does this data come from?
All figures are computed from official SEC filings (10-K), refreshed nightly. This is a data comparison, not investment advice.