Stocks / ESLT vs TRI
ESLT vs TRI
Elbit Systems Ltd. and Thomson Reuters Corporation side by side — fundamentals from SEC filings, refreshed nightly. Sector: Industrials.
ESLT is the larger company ($42.1B vs $34.7B). On the fundamentals, ESLT grows revenue faster (12.9% vs 4.1%); TRI earns a higher net margin (20.1% vs 6.7%); ESLT has the stronger return on equity (12.9% vs 12.6%). Full numbers below — the stronger figure on each row is in green.
| Elbit Systems Ltd. (ESLT) | Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI) | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $42.1B | $34.7B |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $7.94B | $7.48B |
| Net income (latest FY) | $534.34M | $1.50B |
| Revenue growth (5y CAGR) | 12.9% | 4.1% |
| Net margin | 6.7% | 20.1% |
| Return on equity | 12.9% | 12.6% |
| P/E ratio | 72.5 | 22.8 |
| Dividend yield | 0.5% | 3.2% |
| Profitable years (of last 10) | 4 | 4 |
| Positive free cash flow | Yes | Yes |
Compare with another company:
See the full ESLT vs TRI breakdown
Both companies across 19 years of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow — with ratios, health checks and Ask, the SEC-grounded research assistant. Free, no account needed.
Open ESLT's full financials → Open TRI's full financials →More comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, ESLT or TRI?
Elbit Systems Ltd. is larger by market capitalization — $42.1B versus $34.7B.
Which grows faster, ESLT or TRI?
Over the last five fiscal years, Elbit Systems Ltd. grew revenue faster — 12.9%/yr versus 4.1%/yr, computed from SEC-filed statements.
Where does this data come from?
All figures are computed from official SEC filings (10-K), refreshed nightly. This is a data comparison, not investment advice.