stockportfolio.pro
EQT vs FANG: Which Stock Is the Better Buy?
EQT Corporation and Diamondback Energy, Inc. side by side — fundamentals from SEC filings, refreshed nightly. Sector: Energy.
AI verdict — EQT vs FANG, read from the filings
The stronger business, the cheaper stock, and the risks — synthesised from both companies’ SEC filings, every figure computed not guessed. Not investment advice.
| EQT Corporation (EQT) | Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $32.9B | $48.4B |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $8.64B | $15.03B |
| Net income (latest FY) | $2.04B | $1.66B |
| Revenue growth (5y CAGR) | 23.1% | 39.8% |
| Net margin | 23.6% | 11.1% |
| Return on equity | 8.6% | 4.5% |
| P/E ratio | 10.0 | 175.6 |
| Dividend yield | 1.3% | 2.6% |
| Profitable years (of last 10) | 5 | 8 |
| Positive free cash flow | Yes | — |
See the full EQT vs FANG breakdown
Both companies across 19 years of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow — with ratios, health checks and Ask, the SEC-grounded research assistant. Free, no account needed.
Open EQT's full financials → Open FANG's full financials →Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, EQT or FANG?
Diamondback Energy, Inc. is larger by market capitalization — $48.4B versus $32.9B.
Which grows faster, EQT or FANG?
Over the last five fiscal years, Diamondback Energy, Inc. grew revenue faster — 39.8%/yr versus 23.1%/yr, computed from SEC-filed statements.
Where does this data come from?
All figures are computed from official SEC filings (10-K), refreshed nightly. This is a data comparison, not investment advice.