stockportfolio.pro
Stocks / EMN vs HL
EMN vs HL
Eastman Chemical Company and Hecla Mining Company side by side — fundamentals from SEC filings, refreshed nightly. Sector: Basic Materials.
| Eastman Chemical Company (EMN) | Hecla Mining Company (HL) | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $8.2B | $9.5B |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $8.75B | $1.42B |
| Net income (latest FY) | $474.00M | $321.16M |
| Revenue growth (5y CAGR) | 0.7% | 15.5% |
| Net margin | 5.4% | 22.6% |
| Return on equity | 8.0% | 12.4% |
| P/E ratio | 20.8 | 20.4 |
| Dividend yield | 4.6% | 0.1% |
| Profitable years (of last 10) | 10 | 4 |
| Positive free cash flow | Yes | Yes |
Compare them properly — statement by statement
Open either company interactively: 19 years of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow, ratios, health checks, and Ask — the SEC-grounded research assistant.
Open EMN — free Open HL — freeFrequently asked questions
Which is bigger, EMN or HL?
Hecla Mining Company is larger by market capitalization — $9.5B versus $8.2B.
Which grows faster, EMN or HL?
Over the last five fiscal years, Hecla Mining Company grew revenue faster — 15.5%/yr versus 0.7%/yr, computed from SEC-filed statements.
Where does this data come from?
All figures are computed from official SEC filings (10-K), refreshed nightly. This is a data comparison, not investment advice.