stockportfolio.pro
Stocks / CSQ vs UTF
CSQ vs UTF
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc side by side — fundamentals from SEC filings, refreshed nightly. Sector: Financial Services.
| Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (CSQ) | Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $3.1B | $3.0B |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $723.74M | $387.47M |
| Net income (latest FY) | $721.78M | $383.38M |
| Revenue growth (5y CAGR) | — | — |
| Net margin | 99.7% | 98.9% |
| Return on equity | 21.6% | 13.4% |
| P/E ratio | 4.3 | 6.9 |
| Dividend yield | 7.5% | 7.3% |
| Profitable years (of last 10) | 3 | 3 |
| Positive free cash flow | — | — |
Compare them properly — statement by statement
Open either company interactively: 19 years of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow, ratios, health checks, and Ask — the SEC-grounded research assistant.
Open CSQ — free Open UTF — freeFrequently asked questions
Which is bigger, CSQ or UTF?
Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund is larger by market capitalization — $3.1B versus $3.0B.
Which grows faster, CSQ or UTF?
Five-year growth data is not available for both companies.
Where does this data come from?
All figures are computed from official SEC filings (10-K), refreshed nightly. This is a data comparison, not investment advice.