Stocks / CRH vs MT

CRH vs MT: Which Stock Is the Better Buy?

CRH plc and ArcelorMittal S.A. side by side — fundamentals from SEC filings, refreshed nightly. Sector: Basic Materials.

CRH is the larger company ($71.9B vs $50.3B). On the fundamentals, CRH grows revenue faster (6.4% vs -8.4%); CRH earns a higher net margin (10.0% vs 5.1%); CRH has the stronger return on equity (15.6% vs 5.8%). On the filings, CRH carries fewer potential red flags (0 vs 1). Full numbers below — the stronger figure on each row is in green.

AI verdict — CRH vs MT, read from the filings

The stronger business, the cheaper stock, and the risks — synthesised from both companies’ SEC filings, every figure computed not guessed. Not investment advice.

	CRH plc (CRH)	ArcelorMittal S.A. (MT)
Market cap	$71.9B	$50.3B
Revenue (latest FY)	$37.45B	$61.35B
Net income (latest FY)	$3.75B	$3.15B
Revenue growth (5y CAGR)	6.4%	-8.4%
Net margin	10.0%	5.1%
Return on equity	15.6%	5.8%
P/E ratio	19.9	17.3
Dividend yield	1.5%	0.9%
Profitable years (of last 10)	5	4
Positive free cash flow	Yes	Yes

Compare with another company:

See the full CRH vs MT breakdown

Both companies across 19 years of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow — with ratios, health checks and Ask, the SEC-grounded research assistant. Free, no account needed.

Open CRH's full financials → Open MT's full financials →

More comparisons

APD vs CRH MT vs NUE AEM vs CRH MT vs WPM CRH vs ECL CTVA vs MT B vs CRH FNV vs MT

Frequently asked questions

Which is bigger, CRH or MT?

CRH plc is larger by market capitalization — $71.9B versus $50.3B.

Which grows faster, CRH or MT?

Over the last five fiscal years, CRH plc grew revenue faster — 6.4%/yr versus -8.4%/yr, computed from SEC-filed statements.

Where does this data come from?

All figures are computed from official SEC filings (10-K), refreshed nightly. This is a data comparison, not investment advice.

Keep exploring

Quality compounders →

CRH fundamentals → · MT fundamentals → · All 1,500+ companies → · Free screener →