stockportfolio.pro
Stocks / CDNS vs GLW
CDNS vs GLW
Cadence Design Systems, Inc. and Corning Incorporated side by side — fundamentals from SEC filings, refreshed nightly. Sector: Technology.
GLW is the larger company ($151.0B vs $107.5B). On the fundamentals, CDNS grows revenue faster (14.6% vs 7.7%); CDNS earns a higher net margin (20.9% vs 9.7%); CDNS has the stronger return on equity (20.3% vs 13.5%). Full numbers below — the stronger figure on each row is in green.
| Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) | Corning Incorporated (GLW) | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $107.5B | $151.0B |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $5.30B | $16.41B |
| Net income (latest FY) | $1.11B | $1.60B |
| Revenue growth (5y CAGR) | 14.6% | 7.7% |
| Net margin | 20.9% | 9.7% |
| Return on equity | 20.3% | 13.5% |
| P/E ratio | 90.4 | 89.0 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.6% |
| Profitable years (of last 10) | 10 | 9 |
| Positive free cash flow | Yes | Yes |
Compare with another company:
See the full CDNS vs GLW breakdown
Both companies across 19 years of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow — with ratios, health checks and Ask, the SEC-grounded research assistant. Free, no account needed.
Open CDNS's full financials → Open GLW's full financials →More comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Which is bigger, CDNS or GLW?
Corning Incorporated is larger by market capitalization — $151.0B versus $107.5B.
Which grows faster, CDNS or GLW?
Over the last five fiscal years, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. grew revenue faster — 14.6%/yr versus 7.7%/yr, computed from SEC-filed statements.
Where does this data come from?
All figures are computed from official SEC filings (10-K), refreshed nightly. This is a data comparison, not investment advice.