stockportfolio.pro
Stocks / BAM vs MRSH
BAM vs MRSH
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. and Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. side by side — fundamentals from SEC filings, refreshed nightly. Sector: Financial Services.
| Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM) | Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (MRSH) | |
|---|---|---|
| Market cap | $72.8B | $80.1B |
| Revenue (latest FY) | $4.61B | $26.98B |
| Net income (latest FY) | $2.48B | $4.16B |
| Revenue growth (5y CAGR) | 7.0% | 9.4% |
| Net margin | 53.9% | 15.4% |
| Return on equity | 30.6% | 27.2% |
| P/E ratio | 29.2 | 20.8 |
| Dividend yield | 4.4% | 2.1% |
| Profitable years (of last 10) | 4 | 10 |
| Positive free cash flow | — | Yes |
Compare them properly — statement by statement
Open either company interactively: 19 years of income statement, balance sheet and cash flow, ratios, health checks, and Ask — the SEC-grounded research assistant.
Open BAM — free Open MRSH — freeFrequently asked questions
Which is bigger, BAM or MRSH?
Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. is larger by market capitalization — $80.1B versus $72.8B.
Which grows faster, BAM or MRSH?
Over the last five fiscal years, Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. grew revenue faster — 9.4%/yr versus 7.0%/yr, computed from SEC-filed statements.
Where does this data come from?
All figures are computed from official SEC filings (10-K), refreshed nightly. This is a data comparison, not investment advice.